🔗 Amphetamines And You

The official story is that prescribed amphetamines have a similar risk profile to other psychiatric medications. As soon as you start digging, this story rapidly becomes extremely problematic.

Amphetamine is the same molecule whether it's legal or not.

I used to do a lot more advocacy than I do now. The number of people I got diagnosed with ADHD was in the double digits. I basically stopped doing it because how many fucking ruined lives are you willing to be responsible for? One should have been plenty.

Stimulants (especially amphetamines) have a distinctive failure mode in which the drug destroys the reliability of the person reporting on its effects.

If someone's antidepressants are not good for them, and you say so, the reply will look like "yeah, I guess I've been in a bad mood a lot lately. You might be onto something. I'm going to talk to my doctor."

If someone's amphetamines are not good for them, and you say so, the reply will often be more like "FUCK YOU. HOW DARE YOU? WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU KNOW? YOU'RE NOT QUALIFIED, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS OR MY MEDICAL HISTORY. WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO GIVE ME MEDICAL ADVICE?" In these cases, the person becomes incredibly forceful, certain, and morally outraged; completely unreachable while utterly convinced of their own clarity.

Everything is louder and brighter. Everything makes more sense. Every conflict has an obvious villain. The drug itself becomes untouchable and unspeakable. The person's anger is focused, incandescent and driven. There is a very shouty, very defensive, very aggressive user culture surrounding amphetamines.

In Victoria, a common arrangement is that a psychiatrist diagnoses ADHD, then delegates prescribing rights to a GP the patient sees monthly (aside from maybe a yearly check-in with the psychiatrist). These appointments are, in reality, mostly self report:

"How's your mood?" "Good."

"How's your focus?" "Excellent."

"Sleeping okay?" "Yeah."

"Not feeling irritable?" "No."

"Here's your script."

Meanwhile, their partner suddenly became a narcissist, their parents became toxic, and their best friend never wants to talk to them again. But the meds are going great.

Overconfident moral recoding of the people around them (often in Internet therapy language) becomes normal, and tends not to be noticed as a symptom.

Studies on the drugs look very similar: lots of self-report and a lack of attention towards the carnage in the person's broader life. Patients will accidentally "conspire" to make the drug look safe, because they'll say whatever they need to so they can keep receiving it.

An FDA review of another stimulant program spells the logic out even more bluntly: in the "traditional design" with open-label titration and randomisation of only patients who tolerated the drug, events causing discontinuation before randomization would not be counted. [1] In other words, be aware that the study pre-filters in the people who want to stay on the drug, making it look safer and more effective than it really is.

Self-assessment doesn't only fail at detecting escalating aggression: it can also fail to detect the drugs actively worsening the person's functioning.

My ex was a teacher. Paperwork was more than half of her job, and most of the remainder was sharing and receiving information orally. Before her first NDIS planning meeting, I tried to explain the basics of what she was about to go through. She couldn't concentrate enough to listen to a 5 minute explanation, and asked for a printed note (with the key terms bolded). I did this. In the middle of the note was a 20pt bold red headline: "DO NOT SHOW THEM THIS."

She started the planning meeting without having read it, and when they asked about her impairment, she brandished it in front of them and said "I can't even read this!"

But her focus was excellent, apparently.

There is a genetic component to this: the phenotypes associated with having ADHD do not preclude the ones which render a person susceptible to major trouble from amphetamines. It is absolutely possible to genuinely have ADHD, and also respond to amphetamines with addiction, aggression, or both. It might even make your focus worse.

I did not suddenly turn into an abuser the day my wife filled her first Vyvanse script. The human cost of this problem is very real. I was the one who made the diagnosis happen, too.

🔗 Other Lived Experience

"Amphetamines make you into the worst version of yourself. People become super defensive about the drugs."
~ Anonymous

"I'd concur with the other quote. It made them literally the opposite of what their genuine personality is. Top, solid, good person, but when they were on it, it just wiped that out, and it was like they were a blob of dark, heavy, angry energy. You could just be near them and that was the aura you'd feel."
~ Anonymous

"It was a bit scary. I gotta get away from them."
~ Anonymous

🔗 Checkin

Written on: 7.5mg olanzapine since 2025-11-11; taken continuously since 2006

Cognitive capacity: improving! - estimate 15% of brain and climbing

I absolutely think that objective longitudinal metrics should be a critical part of ADHD treatment, but that's a story for another time. Amphetamine-induced mania is an entirely new level of fucked up, and you should be aware of it.